Comments on: CA-MRSA: natural or enginereed? http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/ Believe nothing. No matter where you read it, Or who said it, Even if I have said it, Unless it agrees with your own reason And your own common sense. Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:48:30 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Spencer Jones http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-164 Spencer Jones Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:06:15 +0000 http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-164 There is now a web site documenting four new studies proving that colloidal silver is the best all-around treatment for MRSA. See www.ColloidalSilverCuresMRSA.com There is now a web site documenting four new studies proving that colloidal silver is the best all-around treatment for MRSA. See http://www.ColloidalSilverCuresMRSA.com

]]> By: dianarn http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-51 dianarn Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:57:15 +0000 http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-51 I agree with you on the silver for a few reasons. If you'll read my post, <a href='http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/a-lighthouse-in-an-ocean-of-darkness/' rel="nofollow">A lighthouse in an ocean of darkness</a>, you'll see my stance on silver. I've been trying out Silver Biotics products for a few weeks and researched them a bit. Colloidal silver solutions, depending on the manufacturer, can have really high doses of silver, which, if taken for a long time, can cause argyria. The Silver Biotics solution contains charged silver particles, smaller than colloidal, and at only 10ppm/teaspoon. I guess there's a couple hospitals using a 32ppm solution as a hand disinfectant, rather than alcohol. I'm still researching this, so I can't say "Yes, it works for sure." I don't know if orally ingested silver passes into the bloodstream or stays in the digestive tract. Using silver products on wounds would be beneficial, since it has antiseptic properties. Thanks for your comment. I agree with you on the silver for a few reasons. If you’ll read my post, A lighthouse in an ocean of darkness, you’ll see my stance on silver. I’ve been trying out Silver Biotics products for a few weeks and researched them a bit. Colloidal silver solutions, depending on the manufacturer, can have really high doses of silver, which, if taken for a long time, can cause argyria. The Silver Biotics solution contains charged silver particles, smaller than colloidal, and at only 10ppm/teaspoon. I guess there’s a couple hospitals using a 32ppm solution as a hand disinfectant, rather than alcohol.

I’m still researching this, so I can’t say “Yes, it works for sure.” I don’t know if orally ingested silver passes into the bloodstream or stays in the digestive tract. Using silver products on wounds would be beneficial, since it has antiseptic properties.

Thanks for your comment.

]]> By: spencerjonesy http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-50 spencerjonesy Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:47:32 +0000 http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-50 This was published in the Evening Telegraph, a British newspaper. For a FREE report on safe, daily colloidal silver dosage levels, please visit http://www.thesilveredge.com Mans claims colloidal silver cured his MRSA infection... http://www.northantset.co.uk/675/Man39s-MRSA-cure-claims.941888.jp An elderly man who lived with a potentially lethal infection for two years claims he has cleared himself of the illness with colloidal silver. David Sharman, 82, was infected with superbug MRSA in June, 2001, but believes determination and a regular dose of colloidal silver has helped him beat the infection. He said: "There are so many terrible stories about MRSA in the news, but people seem to just talk about it and are not doing anything. "I started to use colloidal silver and, after almost two years living with the infection and having regular check-ups, I was told I was clear." Mr Sharman, of Exmouth Avenue, Corby, claims he contracted MRSA after a series of hip operations at Kettering General Hospital during 2001. He said: "The wound on my hip became infected and the hospital informed me that I had MRSA before I was discharged for rehabilitation. "I was determined to help myself and began using colloidal silver directly on my wound daily." Colloidal silver is a liquid commonly used before the 1930s as an antibiotic treatment and is available at health food shops. It works by attaching itself to a vital enzyme found in bacteria and disabling the offending pathogen, preventing it from reproducing. Mr Sharman, who has three children Richard, 22, William, 20, and Sarah, 18, with wife Denise, said: "I could feel myself slowly getting better and the day I got the all-clear, just before Christmas 2003, was an extremely happy day for the whole family. "Getting MRSA doesn't have to mean it is the end of the road and I really believe colloidal silver helped me." Dr Richard Slack is a microbiologist based in Nottingham who works in infection control. He said: "The silver is quite a good antibiotic used in burns units because it does kill MRSA and other bacteria that cause wound infections. "There is absolutely a possibility that this has been beneficial to Mr Sharman." This was published in the Evening Telegraph, a British newspaper. For a FREE report on safe, daily colloidal silver dosage levels, please visit http://www.thesilveredge.com

Mans claims colloidal silver cured his MRSA infection…
http://www.northantset.co.uk/675/Man39s-MRSA-cure-claims.941888.jp

An elderly man who lived with a potentially lethal infection for two years claims he has cleared himself of the illness with colloidal silver.

David Sharman, 82, was infected with superbug MRSA in June, 2001, but believes determination and a regular dose of colloidal silver has helped him beat the infection.

He said: “There are so many terrible stories about MRSA in the news, but people seem to just talk about it and are not doing anything.

“I started to use colloidal silver and, after almost two years living with the infection and having regular check-ups, I was told I was clear.”

Mr Sharman, of Exmouth Avenue, Corby, claims he contracted MRSA after a series of hip operations at Kettering General Hospital during 2001.

He said: “The wound on my hip became infected and the hospital informed me that I had MRSA before I was discharged for rehabilitation.

“I was determined to help myself and began using colloidal silver directly on my wound daily.”

Colloidal silver is a liquid commonly used before the 1930s as an antibiotic treatment and is available at health food shops.
It works by attaching itself to a vital enzyme found in bacteria and disabling the offending pathogen, preventing it from reproducing.

Mr Sharman, who has three children Richard, 22, William, 20, and Sarah, 18, with wife Denise, said: “I could feel myself slowly getting better and the day I got the all-clear, just before Christmas 2003, was an extremely happy day for the whole family.

“Getting MRSA doesn’t have to mean it is the end of the road and I really believe colloidal silver helped me.”

Dr Richard Slack is a microbiologist based in Nottingham who works in infection control.

He said: “The silver is quite a good antibiotic used in burns units because it does kill MRSA and other bacteria that cause wound infections.

“There is absolutely a possibility that this has been beneficial to Mr Sharman.”

]]> By: dianarn http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-47 dianarn Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:40:22 +0000 http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-47 The Medscape article you provided was very good. Thank you for that. Now that you have told me your girlfriend's story, I think both strains can be equally aggressive. The hospital is a shitty place to be even when you're sick enough to be there. You're not moving around as much, you're not breathing as well, you sit in bed all day. Your immune system gets weakened, especially when your body is trying to heal itself from the surgery. CA-MRSA has been infecting healthy people, with good immune systems. From what I've learned, it doesn't appear that HA-MRSA is CA-MRSA that got loose from the hospitals. But it had to come from somewhere. All of these MRSA's (including the "regular" respiratory infection, sorry for not clearing that up) are being blamed on overuse of antibiotics. To tell you the truth, I don't see how this bacteria is able to evolve and mutate so fast, like the third reference I used says. In the end, here's my question. Bacteria has been existing on Earth for longer than we have. Some are good, some are bad. Our bodies have learned to either kill them or live with them. MRSA, in whatever form it is, is still a bacteria. Yet, it has been killing off not just babies and elderly (the ones with lower immune systems) but grown adults with no other health problems. Regardless how resistant it is to antibiotics, your body should still be able to kill it off. But it can't. So they're saying CA-MRSA produces something that kills of neutrophils. That's not something that can be caused by overuse of antibiotics. So here's my two theories on this. I apologize for not posting any links to this stuff, but I'm getting ready to leave. I'll make a blog about this later. 1. This bacteria and all the other "resistant" bacterias and viruses are genetically engineered to do that. This opens up a big can of worms. But then again, that's what the Georgia Guidestones is all about. 2. Our immune systems are weaker and getting progressively weaker than what they were 100 years ago, 200, etc., and they can't fight off these bacterias and viruses. Our bodies are being daily bombarded from the stuff in chemtrails, the pesticides on and in our foods, the actual ingredients in the foods that are nothing but crap, the chemicals in the water, the crap in our toys, etc. Our bodies are constantly fighting all of these things and that's overloading our immune systems so much that we end up dying from the cold, just like AIDS patients. Then again, some people say AIDS is a genetically engineered bio-weapon. The Medscape article you provided was very good. Thank you for that. Now that you have told me your girlfriend’s story, I think both strains can be equally aggressive. The hospital is a shitty place to be even when you’re sick enough to be there. You’re not moving around as much, you’re not breathing as well, you sit in bed all day. Your immune system gets weakened, especially when your body is trying to heal itself from the surgery. CA-MRSA has been infecting healthy people, with good immune systems. From what I’ve learned, it doesn’t appear that HA-MRSA is CA-MRSA that got loose from the hospitals. But it had to come from somewhere. All of these MRSA’s (including the “regular” respiratory infection, sorry for not clearing that up) are being blamed on overuse of antibiotics. To tell you the truth, I don’t see how this bacteria is able to evolve and mutate so fast, like the third reference I used says.

In the end, here’s my question. Bacteria has been existing on Earth for longer than we have. Some are good, some are bad. Our bodies have learned to either kill them or live with them. MRSA, in whatever form it is, is still a bacteria. Yet, it has been killing off not just babies and elderly (the ones with lower immune systems) but grown adults with no other health problems. Regardless how resistant it is to antibiotics, your body should still be able to kill it off. But it can’t. So they’re saying CA-MRSA produces something that kills of neutrophils. That’s not something that can be caused by overuse of antibiotics.

So here’s my two theories on this. I apologize for not posting any links to this stuff, but I’m getting ready to leave. I’ll make a blog about this later.
1. This bacteria and all the other “resistant” bacterias and viruses are genetically engineered to do that. This opens up a big can of worms. But then again, that’s what the Georgia Guidestones is all about.
2. Our immune systems are weaker and getting progressively weaker than what they were 100 years ago, 200, etc., and they can’t fight off these bacterias and viruses. Our bodies are being daily bombarded from the stuff in chemtrails, the pesticides on and in our foods, the actual ingredients in the foods that are nothing but crap, the chemicals in the water, the crap in our toys, etc. Our bodies are constantly fighting all of these things and that’s overloading our immune systems so much that we end up dying from the cold, just like AIDS patients. Then again, some people say AIDS is a genetically engineered bio-weapon.

]]> By: Rocket http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-46 Rocket Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:55:30 +0000 http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-46 Hospital-Acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) and Community-Acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) are different, however, CAMRSA is not an "aggressive strain" as the Associated Press writer suggested. Both are just as deadly if left untreated, as my g/f in Daytona Beach died from HA-MRSA in under 4 weeks. She had broken her ankle and was pinned and cast at the hospital. within a week her leg was swelled over the top of the cast. After removing the cast, scraping the tissue, scraping the bone (having no effect) leading to amputation of the leg and eventually dying in a hyperbaric chamber, total time from onset of infection to death 4 weeks. She fell into a coma 2 weeks after the infection took hold and was in a coma when she died. I am not sure how the AP writer qualifies CA-MRSA as agressive, but HA-MRSA is FAR more agressive by comparison. I'm not sure what "regular MRSA" is in this post, but I only know of the four kinds of MRSA and HA-MRSA is not mostly respiratory in nature because HA-MRSA by definition is due to having visited a Hospital and/or had a surgical procedure. (see article http://microbiology.suite101.com/article.cfm/mrsa__camrsa_and_hamrsa) Also HA-MRSA is usually a direct result of hand to wound contact (ungloved or unsanitized hand/instrument). See Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at http://www.dmidjournal.com/article/PIIS0732889306004275/abstract See CA-MRSA at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/507869 See http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/ar_mrsa.html Hospital-Acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) and Community-Acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) are different, however, CAMRSA is not an “aggressive strain” as the Associated Press writer suggested. Both are just as deadly if left untreated, as my g/f in Daytona Beach died from HA-MRSA in under 4 weeks. She had broken her ankle and was pinned and cast at the hospital. within a week her leg was swelled over the top of the cast. After removing the cast, scraping the tissue, scraping the bone (having no effect) leading to amputation of the leg and eventually dying in a hyperbaric chamber, total time from onset of infection to death 4 weeks. She fell into a coma 2 weeks after the infection took hold and was in a coma when she died. I am not sure how the AP writer qualifies CA-MRSA as agressive, but HA-MRSA is FAR more agressive by comparison. I’m not sure what “regular MRSA” is in this post, but I only know of the four kinds of MRSA and HA-MRSA is not mostly respiratory in nature because HA-MRSA by definition is due to having visited a Hospital and/or had a surgical procedure. (see article http://microbiology.suite101.com/article.cfm/mrsa__camrsa_and_hamrsa) Also HA-MRSA is usually a direct result of hand to wound contact (ungloved or unsanitized hand/instrument).

See Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at http://www.dmidjournal.com/article/PIIS0732889306004275/abstract

See CA-MRSA at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/507869

See http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/ar_mrsa.html

]]> By: www.cellulitediary.info » CA-MRSA: natural or enginereed? http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-45 www.cellulitediary.info » CA-MRSA: natural or enginereed? Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:52:55 +0000 http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-45 [...] dianarn created an interesting post today on CA-MRSA: natural or enginereed?.Here’s a short outline:Oh and by the way, regular MRSA tends to cause mostly respiratory infections. They usually don’t last much outside the hosts. CA-MRSA causes skin and tissue infections and can live outside the body for weeks. [...] [...] dianarn created an interesting post today on CA-MRSA: natural or enginereed?.Here’s a short outline:Oh and by the way, regular MRSA tends to cause mostly respiratory infections. They usually don’t last much outside the hosts. CA-MRSA causes skin and tissue infections and can live outside the body for weeks. [...]

]]> By: Health Tips Blog » CA-MRSA: natural or enginereed? http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-44 Health Tips Blog » CA-MRSA: natural or enginereed? Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:37:05 +0000 http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/ca-mrsa-natural-or-enginereed/#comment-44 [...] Here is an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe infection long has been associated with health care facilities, where it attacks people with reduced immune systems. But many recent cases involve an aggressive strain, community-associated MRSA, or CA-MRSA. … [...] [...] Here is an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe infection long has been associated with health care facilities, where it attacks people with reduced immune systems. But many recent cases involve an aggressive strain, community-associated MRSA, or CA-MRSA. … [...]

]]>